https://dai.ly/x5jky5g
Best in Full Screen and HD
I guess this is even more impressive:-
http://dai.ly/x5jl4zv
This is impressive...
Moderators: Guru's, The Ministry
- petermcleland
- Red Arrows
- Posts: 5201
- Joined: 25 Jul 2004, 10:28
- Location: Dartmouth, Devon
- Contact:
This is impressive...
Regards,
http://www.petermcleland.com/
Updated 28/8/2007
My Channel
http://www.youtube.com/user/petermcleland?feature=mhee
http://www.petermcleland.com/
Updated 28/8/2007
My Channel
http://www.youtube.com/user/petermcleland?feature=mhee
Re: This is impressive...
I'm a big fan of Hornets and rather hoped the RCAF would buy the Super Hornets over this F-35 thing but that is not to be. Without being too political, I had read previously that due to Canada's harsh enviroment and long endurance times patrolling the frozen north for those naughty Russkies that twin engines and a proven airframe were essential. Seemingly not.
Saw the Su-27 (maybe) at Cosford some years ago and remember being surprised at the sheer size of them . Daft I know but seeing them in books and models doesn't translate to real life. Sadly it was a static display only.
Saw the Su-27 (maybe) at Cosford some years ago and remember being surprised at the sheer size of them . Daft I know but seeing them in books and models doesn't translate to real life. Sadly it was a static display only.
Alex
- Airspeed
- Red Arrows
- Posts: 9271
- Joined: 14 Sep 2011, 03:46
- Location: Central Victorian Highlands, Dja Dja Wurrung Country, Australia
- Contact:
Re: This is impressive...
Thanks for the link Peter
Anybody:
Interesting to see that the Russians don't use steam catapults.
I have seen UK carrier(s) with the upward-sloping deck; is this the widely accepted way of launching now?
Anybody:
Interesting to see that the Russians don't use steam catapults.
I have seen UK carrier(s) with the upward-sloping deck; is this the widely accepted way of launching now?